Bloor Homes tree felling and vegetation removal – works beginning 21st February

Late in the day, Bloor Homes have advised that they will be starting work on Monday 21 February on tree felling and vegetation removal to enable the construction of their access road on Henham Road, Elsenham, on the corner just past the cricket pitch.

Work will continue for ten working days, with working hours from 08:00 to 17:00.

They say that affected residents have been informed, and that the works are not expected to be disruptive.
Queries or concerns should be directed to Freephone information line 0800 298 7040 or email

These works are for the construction of the access road only.  A second application has been made for the residential element, comprising up to 350 new homes.  A Zoom meeting will be held with Bloor on Thursday 24 February, 7:30 pm, to discuss these proposals. All residents are welcome to attend the meeting (Agenda).

Elsenham Vale Trim Trails – Documents And Statement

There has been some discussion locally over the future plans for maintenance of the recreational area of Elsenham Vale – known as the Trim Trails.

Originally developed by Crest Nicholson, the developers’ aim was for Elsenham Parish Council to accept a sum of money in return for taking over their maintenance. After careful consideration, the Parish Council declined to do this.

In the following statement, Elsenham Parish Council Chairman Dr. Graham Mott outlines some of the background to this decision, including the original plans for the area.

The Parish Council (PC) was not involved in drawing up the Section 106 (S106) agreement which was negotiated between Uttlesford District Council (UDC) and the developers prior to the commencement of the project.  The PC found out what was in the S106 only when it was published.

It provided that on completion Crest Nicholson would maintain the area including the trim trail for a year, and the Parish Council would then have the option to take it over.  If the option was accepted, the PC would be paid £130,000, index linked from the date of the planning approval to the date of payment, for the maintenance of the area for twenty years.  After that period of time, the PC would be wholly responsible.

Some parish councils decline all such proposals as a matter of policy, but we decided that we would consider each case on its merits.  The documents which were available to the PC are a Planting Plan and Landscape Management Plan.

It is not too easy to make out the Planting Plan on the screen, but if you save, rotate and enlarge, it should help.  The key on the bottom left shows areas of grass seed, wildflower, native woodland, bulb planting and rough grassland.

It all looks very pretty.  But the first problem is that the developers made no attempt before they left the site to follow the Planting Plan.  The defect was pointed out to UDC by the PC.  There were other problems – for instance the several efforts to stabilise the footpath through the trim trail, particularly near the motorway where it was washed away several times.

The second issue was that the Management Plan is very detailed.  It was felt that, even if the area had been brought up to the required standard, the Parish Council would be held to the details as prescribed, and we would need to employ contractors for the purpose.  £130,000 / 20 = £6,500 pa, which did not look very generous.

The PC decided, therefore, that there was no option other than to decline to adopt the area.  Our understanding was that the maintenance payment that Crest Nicholson was due to pay to the PC was now going to the management company for maintenance purposes, and therefore the residents would not have an increase in their payments for some years.  But it seems that did not happen and some lesser sum was made available.

There have been several misconceptions – one resident said that the PC had had discussions with the landscaping subcontractor, but in fact we’d never heard of them.  We did have discussions with CN.

Summary:  The PC was not party to the agreement that we should have the option of taking over the area.  CN made no attempt to bring it up to the standard specified.  The Management Plan was very detailed and would have been expensive to implement.  Discussions were held with CN but not with the landscape subcontractor. 

The PC was under no obligation to accept the area, and members felt there was no alternative to declining the offer.

Fairfield appeal

The Appeal by Fairfield against refusal of their application for up to 350 dwellings to the north-west of Henham Road will be heard via Microsoft Teams commencing at 13:30 on 9 November 2020, and is scheduled to last for 8 days.

If you wish to attend at any time, you should contact the Planning Inspectorate Case Officer, preferably by email, or Tel 0303 444 5304, quoting the Planning Inspectorate’s reference: APP/C1570/W/19/3243744

Please state whether you want to take an active part, or wish to attend as an observer.

All representations already made will be considered. by the Inspector. You can view all the documents on UDC’s website /simple search, ref: UTT/17/3573/OP

This is your chance to impress the Inspector with the breadth of opposition to this application.

New Housing Development in Elsenham



In responding to them, it is not necessary to go into details as to the reasons – that can be reserved for the response to UDC when the planning application is lodged.

As part of the application, the developers will prepare a statement to show how they have involved the community. They will state how many people responded to their consultation. The smaller the number, the better it looks for them.

Wallace Land Investments is preparing a planning application for a new residential development of approximately 104 homes on land west of Elsenham. The new dwellings will be developed across two sites:
* Land off Isabel Drive
* Land off Stansted Road